From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <vlasenko@imath.kiev.ua>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:03:43 +0300
From: Igor Vlasenko <vlasenko@imath.kiev.ua>
To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20120510120343.GA2601@dad.imath.kiev.ua>
References: <1828248.SrJ6UXPMeF@home.localdomain>
	<20120509212403.GB3874@altlinux.org>
	<20120509215318.GS17612@osdn.org.ua>
	<201205100103.34491.led@altlinux.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <201205100103.34491.led@altlinux.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-imath-kiev-ua-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
	information
X-imath-kiev-ua-MailScanner-ID: 3F1004B08F5.AD077
X-imath-kiev-ua-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-imath-kiev-ua-MailScanner-From: vlasenko@imath.kiev.ua
Subject: Re: [devel] Q: systemd policy ?
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:03:53 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20120510120343.GA2601@dad.imath.kiev.ua/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 01:03:34AM +0300, led@altlinux.ru wrote:
> Возможно, имеет смысл задефайнить %systemd_unitdir через %_unitdir, убрать упоминания о %systemd_unitdir из документации 
> и wiki, добавить WARNING на использование %systemd_unitdir в спеке.

+1

> Или, в конце концов, припахать пресловутых робов (занимающихся сейчас фигнёй) чтоб они сделали хоть что-то полезное.

Припашу (есть для таких случаев тест и патч-генератор)
как только %_unitdir появится в rpm и systemd policy draft.

-- 

Dr. Igor Vlasenko
--------------------
Topology Department
Institute of Math
Kiev, Ukraine


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.