From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 00:21:39 +0300 From: Michael Shigorin To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Message-ID: <20110515212139.GJ12678@osdn.org.ua> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions References: <4DC9701B.8020907@yandex.ru> <20110510193911.GX1412@osdn.org.ua> <4DCFEAC2.2010809@yandex.ru> <4DCFECA3.2080904@altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DCFECA3.2080904@altlinux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: [devel] Seamonkey: NEW unmet dependencies detected X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 21:21:45 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 06:09:23PM +0300, Alex Negulescu wrote: > Try finding deps with buildreq and add: AutoReq: no AutoReq: is about Requires: while buildreq(1) is about BuildRequires: -- these are rather different. > It will work like this. Nope. -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/