From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:07:11 +0200 From: Igor Vlasenko To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Message-ID: <20110130210711.GA2619@dad.imath.kiev.ua> References: <20110129214846.GA27634@dad.imath.kiev.ua> <20110129230655.GA30604@altlinux.org> <20110130181910.GA1196@dad.imath.kiev.ua> <20110130182958.GD30604@altlinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20110130182958.GD30604@altlinux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Subject: Re: [devel] %{get_dep somelib} deprecation X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:07:19 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 09:29:59PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > В некоторых местах вместо get_dep используется get_version > или get_SVR. Наверное, их нужно диагностировать точно так же, > как get_dep. Спасибо, посмотрел, get_version испоьзовался по разному, буду ругать use case вида Requires: foo >= %{get_version bar} -- Dr. Igor Vlasenko -------------------- Topology Department Institute of Math Kiev, Ukraine