From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ldv@altlinux.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:50:44 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20101207175043.GA17909@altlinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
References: <20101204162911.GA12275@altlinux.org>
	<20101204164239.GC15470@altlinux.org>
	<20101204165244.GA31801@altlinux.org>
	<20101204170557.GE15470@altlinux.org>
	<20101204175200.GC31801@altlinux.org>
	<20101204212831.GA25886@altlinux.org>
	<20101204232644.GA30257@altlinux.org>
	<20101204234126.GB25886@altlinux.org>
	<20101205000316.GA5836@altlinux.org>
	<20101205002114.GC25886@altlinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101205002114.GC25886@altlinux.org>
X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D  3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 0/3] optimize rpmsetcmp()
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:50:44 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20101207175043.GA17909@altlinux.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>


--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 03:21:15AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> There are other reasons, such as keeping the code comprehensible (at the
> expense of some runtime penalties).  I think the concept of bitv[] is
> crucial for understanding the code, and it helps to keep the code clean
> and self-evident.  Replacing bitv[] with bitmap might be a major trade-off
> for the sake of performance.  Or might not.

Storing one byte per bit is crucial for understanding the code?
What a nonsense!


--=20
ldv

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkz+c/MACgkQfKvmrJ41Nh48ygCfSUcsUwQLvoM8Ajthc9fS/Hh8
uyAAn2RXvLHwuHqgZjMfnlLfJyq6p9m2
=MOs9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--