From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:39:20 +0300 From: Alexey Tourbin To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Message-ID: <20101205123919.GF25886@altlinux.org> References: <1290722666-24606-1-git-send-email-kirill@shutemov.name> <20101205012451.GD25886@altlinux.org> <20101205111810.GA20191@altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101205111810.GA20191@altlinux.org> Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 0/3] optimize rpmsetcmp() X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 12:39:21 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:18:10PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 04:24:51AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > > The answer is: no. > > The reason is: compilcated. > > The explanation is: > > Don't try to improve my code. > > Your pride makes you blind: you cannot grasp the idea that your code > has a room for optimization :(. That weakens all your reasoning. Indeed, as for set.c, I exercise djb-like approach: either show me a major problem, or, basically, no way. However, the code is released under GPL and LGPL - you can make changes on your own (and I can revert them later). > Note that somebody has to support your code when you are missing for > months. I am now tempted to say that there is no need to support my code. And I'm not missing for months - rather, I can't speak in a low mood. > -- > ldv