From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 14:18:10 +0300 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Message-ID: <20101205111810.GA20191@altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions References: <1290722666-24606-1-git-send-email-kirill@shutemov.name> <20101205012451.GD25886@altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101205012451.GD25886@altlinux.org> X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D 3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 0/3] optimize rpmsetcmp() X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:18:10 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 04:24:51AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > The answer is: no. > The reason is: compilcated. > The explanation is: > Don't try to improve my code. Your pride makes you blind: you cannot grasp the idea that your code has a room for optimization :(. That weakens all your reasoning. Note that somebody has to support your code when you are missing for months. --=20 ldv --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkz7dPIACgkQfKvmrJ41Nh5dcgCdF+UpJGHxytqDcAJtp/oGgAoi lz0AnRWNIFJ4ZjJvtSorQYb3SGpvLvre =Muel -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q--