From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ldv@altlinux.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 03:35:42 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20101130003541.GA20093@altlinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
References: <1290722666-24606-1-git-send-email-kirill@shutemov.name>
	<20101126083537.GA26344@shutemov.name>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101126083537.GA26344@shutemov.name>
X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D  3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 0/3] optimize rpmsetcmp()
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:35:42 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20101130003541.GA20093@altlinux.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>


--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:35:37AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:04:23AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutsemov wrote:
> >=20
> > Tested on Intel Core2 Duo P9500, 3GiB RAM. i586.
>=20
> apt-shell < /dev/null
[...]
> Around 41% of speed up.

On AMD Opteron Processor 275:
without patches:
2.98user 0.19system 0:03.18elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+10142minor)pagefaults 0swaps
with patches:
2.20user 0.21system 0:02.42elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+9978minor)pagefaults 0swaps
speedup is around 24%

On AMD Opteron Processor 2216:
without patches:
2.42user 0.02system 0:02.44elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+9784minor)pagefaults 0swaps
with patches:
1.86user 0.02system 0:01.88elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+9601minor)pagefaults 0swaps
speedup is around 23%

On Intel Xeon 5110
without patches:
2.98user 0.04system 0:03.02elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+9789minor)pagefaults 0swaps
with patches:
2.54user 0.01system 0:02.55elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+9608minor)pagefaults 0swaps
speedup is around 16%

On Intel Xeon E5520
without patches:
2.02user 0.00system 0:02.02elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+9730minor)pagefaults 0swaps
with patches:
1.77user 0.00system 0:01.77elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+9565minor)pagefaults 0swaps
speedup is around 12%

Not so amazing as on your test platform, but awesome anyway.
I'm going to apply these patches.
If anybody has objections, please speak up now.


--=20
ldv

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkz0Rt0ACgkQfKvmrJ41Nh5dKgCgm3/73VvUxLVTxSaofrw4UoSX
eaEAnRrBocfkL1J0iMaGCveSLV4sgmK3
=LyIC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--