From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 From: "Sergey Y. Afonin" Organization: Kraft-S JSC To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:35:01 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20101105071630.GA3819@truecrux.org> In-Reply-To: <20101105071630.GA3819@truecrux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201011051035.02112.asy@altlinux.ru> Subject: Re: [devel] freeswitch vs libcelt X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:35:16 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Friday 05 November 2010, Vladimir Lettiev wrote: > Ошибка вследствии того, что в libcelt 0.8.1 поменялся API, данный модуль > заточен на использование libcelt < 0.8.0 > > Как это можно исправить? Я тут на странную фразу наткнулся: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Installation_Guide The FreeSWITCH team strongly recommends the use of the latest Git tree as opposed to the snapshots or other tarballs. The Git tree is extremely stable! Furthermore, in many cases people check out older versions of FreeSWITCH and report bugs that have already been fixed. The developers will insist on any bug reports being tested on an updated install from Git. Может там уже починили ? -- С уважением, Сергей Афонин