From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:53:24 +0200 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Message-ID: <20101103125324.GA1213@shutemov.name> References: <20101103123300.GA1153@shutemov.name> <4CD15891.9070705@altlinux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4CD15891.9070705@altlinux.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) Subject: Re: [devel] libcairo-devel requires libpixman-devel ? X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:53:29 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 03:41:53PM +0300, Anton Farygin wrote: > 03.11.2010 15:33, Kirill A. Shutemov пишет: > > http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/31871/build/5/i586/log > > > > checking GTK_CFLAGS... Package pixman-1 was not found in the pkg-config > > search path. > > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `pixman-1.pc' > > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable > > Package 'pixman-1', required by 'cairo', not found > > > > Правильно ли я понимаю: libcairo-devel не хватает зависимости на > > libpixman-devel? > > Не только, многие другие зависимости pkg-config'а тоже развалились: > > $ pkg-config --cflags librsvg-2.0 > Package dri2proto was not found in the pkg-config search path. > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `dri2proto.pc' > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable > Package 'dri2proto', required by 'gl', not found Это последствие недавних изменений вокруг pkg-config'? -- Kirill A. Shutemov