From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:56:17 +0400 From: Alexey Tourbin To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Message-ID: <20100901005615.GE11960@altlinux.org> References: <20100829181645.GA6880@mw.office.seiros.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100829181645.GA6880@mw.office.seiros.ru> Subject: Re: [devel] debug subpackages X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:56:19 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:16:45PM +0400, Денис Смирнов wrote: > А с debug subpackages у нас опять все заглохло? Debuginfo subpackages if not a priority. See why. Lemme ask you a question. Did you ever run a '-g -O2' binary under gdb? Haven't you ever seen something like "this piece of shit have been optimized out, and there's absolutely no way to recover it"? That's why I'm skeptical about *-debuginfo packages. Optimizations and debugging do not fit quite well. (And there are other reasons, too.)