From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ldv@altlinux.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 22:02:53 +0400
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20100705180253.GA1621@wo.int.altlinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
References: <20100630124221.GD15359@snowwhite.immo>
	<20100630125000.GE15359@snowwhite.immo>
	<20100705172437.GA11465@altlinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100705172437.GA11465@altlinux.org>
X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D  3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E
Subject: Re: [devel]
	=?koi8-r?b?L3Vzci9saWIvcnBtL3BrZ2NvbmZpZy5wcm92IC0tINPM?=
	=?koi8-r?b?ydvLz80g09TSz8fB0SDQ0s/XxdLLwSDOwSDXxdLTycA=?=
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:02:53 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20100705180253.GA1621@wo.int.altlinux.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>


--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:24:37PM +0400, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 04:50:00PM +0400, Konstantin Pavlov wrote:
> > thresh@snowwhite ~ $ /usr/lib/rpm/pkgconfig.prov ./librtmp.pc
> > pkgconfig.prov: ERROR: /home/thresh/librtmp.pc: invalid pkg-config outp=
ut: librtmp =3D v2.2f
>=20
> In "v2.2f", "f" is probably okay, but "v" is bad idea - as you try
> to compare v-version against non-v version, a funny thing will happen.

These pkg-config version "numbers" are not our choice, we just have to
support it.


--=20
ldv

--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkwyHk0ACgkQfKvmrJ41Nh7IXQCfXMeeZ2oQm4+fYDCEuS5VUyv+
BBUAni9IGwkG0asZ5jXZ8a2mPgAsG07s
=T3fk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--liOOAslEiF7prFVr--