From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ldv@altlinux.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:22:18 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20100318222217.GB3404@wo.int.altlinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions
	<devel@lists.altlinux.org>
References: <cc557aab1003181514i65cbf139le7561edf13470874@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cc557aab1003181514i65cbf139le7561edf13470874@mail.gmail.com>
X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D  3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E
Subject: Re: [devel] Q: --no-add-needed
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:22:18 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20100318222217.GB3404@wo.int.altlinux.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>


--JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:14:14AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> There is potentially important change in gcc-4.4.3-5 from Fedora. IIUC, t=
hey
> added --no-add-needed (AKA --no-copy-dt-needed-entries) to default
> linker flags.

I'm not surprised.

> Dmitry, what is your opinion on this? Do we need this change in our
> toolchain now?

Yes, I think we also need it.

> Do we needed testing rebuild of Sisyphus with this change
> before integration into Sisyphus?

I hope regular weekend test rebuild is enough.


--=20
ldv

--JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuip5kACgkQfKvmrJ41Nh4dAACgmtZX1MivAYSP1bltAWhWghFE
AKcAniSysZWqXgnYo2PjyZ+zwygeyAVk
=3twd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq--