From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:48:08 +0300 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: ALT Devel discussion list Message-ID: <20100317204808.GA16339@wo.int.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: <20100317170453.EA1B41DB65AA@ssh.git.orion.altlinux.org> <20100317181129.GA23563@wo.int.altlinux.org> <20100317192512.GA8265@altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100317192512.GA8265@altlinux.org> X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D 3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E Subject: Re: [devel] packages/girar-builder: heads/master X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:48:09 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:25:13PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:11:29PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 08:04:53PM +0300, Alexey M. Tourbin wrote: > > > Update of /people/at/packages/girar-builder.git > > >=20 > > > Changes statistics since `0.1-37-gd5591b2' follows: > > > gb-task-check-lastchange | 10 ++++++++++ > > > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > >=20 > > > Changelog since `0.1-37-gd5591b2' follows: > > > commit 199ac69c43909442a857a2e23b93d9fce4617a42 > > > Author: Alexey Tourbin > > > Date: Wed Mar 17 20:04:06 2010 +0300 > > >=20 > > > gb-task-check-lastchange: handle kernel-image-* and kernel-module= s-* specially > >=20 > > There are no need to add these exceptions yet. Instead, I suggest to > > apply this check only for those packages that are not tested for git > > inheritance, i.e. only for packages built/copied from srpms. >=20 > And why testing gear-based src.rpm packages could be possibly wrong? > Is there a good reason for removing last changelog entry from specfile? I have no idea what do you name as "good" reasons, but certainly there are reasons to push changes violating your gb-task-check-lastchange. For example, the cdrkit release mentioned earlier. Of course there is a known way to bypass all these inheritance checks by renaming source packages, but it makes our repository uglier. --=20 ldv --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuhQAgACgkQfKvmrJ41Nh5zywCfYBFlk8e7BoLPj/MX6D8tkUFC UwIAnRTmEsmpBk0N04dGy6uh3pJvR7AZ =Wl9c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--