From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <at@altlinux.ru>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:17:18 +0300
From: Alexey Tourbin <at@altlinux.ru>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20100217161718.GD8069@altlinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
References: <921f6bb41002170406i1dfa43bbn4a6afee0a19840ba@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100217154153.GE26455@wo.int.altlinux.org>
	<20100217160525.GC8069@altlinux.org>
	<20100217161334.GA17407@altlinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100217161334.GA17407@altlinux.org>
Subject: Re: [devel]
	=?koi8-r?b?8MHSwc3F1NLZIMsgzcHL0s/Twc0uIHdhczogzcHL0s/T?=
	=?koi8-r?b?ICVzdWJzdF9lbmFibGVfdG8gLyAlc3Vic3Rfd2l0aF90bw==?=
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:17:18 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20100217161718.GD8069@altlinux.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>


--0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:13:34PM +0300, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:05:25PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> > Hmm, maybe the same macro can handle both cases?
>=20
> > %def_with cairo ->
> > 	--with-cairo
> > %def_with cairo=3Dinstalled
> > 	--with-cairo=3Dinstalled
>=20
> How about The Uber Case?
>=20
> %def_with cairo-libs=3D%_libdir/cairo ->
> 	--with-cairo-libs=3D%_libdir/cairo

So you're trying to say it can't work.  For now, I can't see why.
Look, %def_with is a macro, and it has an argument.  The argument
can be mangled (to make and indentifier).  So...

--0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkt8Fo4ACgkQfBKgtDjnu0brHQCfVs6/xckbkerKUOhM4FHopv/n
ZJYAoKmEdHdvUGbg9R20kI+S0CXYfbhB
=PtoU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a--