From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:36:16 +0300 From: Alexey Tourbin To: ALT Devel discussion list Message-ID: <20091221233616.GN9864@altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: <20091221154028.9681B2D7602E@ssh.git.orion.altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YYkI1bN/Wg3dLcB1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091221154028.9681B2D7602E@ssh.git.orion.altlinux.org> Subject: [devel] noarch and /usr/share (packages/aptitude: tags/0.4.5-alt5) X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:36:18 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --YYkI1bN/Wg3dLcB1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 06:40:28PM +0300, Alexey I. Froloff wrote: > 0.4.5-alt5 > =20 > - Packaged User's Manual, dropped useless data and developer README's > - doc subpackage made noarch > - Resurrected changelog viewer > --- a/aptitude.spec > +++ b/aptitude.spec > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > =20 > Name: aptitude > Version: 0.4.5 > -Release: alt4 > +Release: alt5 > =20 > Summary: Terminal-based apt frontend > Group: System/Configuration/Packaging > @@ -29,6 +29,15 @@ can't be ported to apt-rpm. > %package doc > Summary: English manual for aptitude, a terminal-based apt frontend > Group: Books/Computer books > +# Can't use noarch: > +#--- aptitude-doc-0.4.5-alt5.noarch.rpm.i586 2009-12-21 18:23:35 +03= 00 > +#+++ aptitude-doc-0.4.5-alt5.noarch.rpm.x86_64 2009-12-21 18:23:35 +03= 00 > +#@@ -77,35 +77,35 @@ > +# /usr/share/doc/aptitude-doc-0.4.5/index.html > +#-/usr/share/doc/aptitude-doc-0.4.5/ld-id2608397.html > +#+/usr/share/doc/aptitude-doc-0.4.5/ld-id3016206.html > +#... > +#BuildArch: noarch > Conflicts: %name < %version-%release > Conflicts: %name > %version-%release Shouldn't /usr/share part of the packages be identical, much the same way as noarch packages must be identical? I think I am going to implement much stricter checking for both noarch packages and /usr/share part of arch packages. Also, I am going to implement new "force-noarch" check which will require some packages be noarch (by the principle of "extensional equality"). If you don't like it, now is the right time to have your say. --YYkI1bN/Wg3dLcB1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkswBnAACgkQfBKgtDjnu0b1DwCgqdSifRBq4ZUcg8yldIHn5naR mswAn1nj2atu7xPFSdnopvr8p/o7OATe =9E3e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YYkI1bN/Wg3dLcB1--