From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 From: Sergei Epiphanov Organization: OKSAT To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:53:53 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.3 (Linux/2.6.30-std-def-alt14; KDE/4.3.3; i686; ; ) References: <4B223383.5050703@mmedia2.kemsu.ru> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200912111553.53509.serpiph@nikiet.ru> X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0284], KAS30/Release X-SpamTest-Info: Not protected X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux Mail Server 5.6.39/RELEASE, bases: 20091211 #3357402, check: 20091211 clean Subject: Re: [devel] [Fwd: [#16528] COMPLETE (try 23) python.git=2.6.4-alt1_ srpm=scons-1.1.0-alt1.1.src.rpm ...] X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:56:23 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: В сообщении от 11 декабря 2009 15:39:52 автор Max Ivanov написал: > Does at@ or ldv@ have any ideas how to further improve builder > performance? There never was so stressfull load on infrastructure and > hope never be in near future, but will we wait so long time if it > happens again? Python 3.1 may be the same stressful package as 2.6. Or even more serious. > Why packages without direct python dependencies (runtime or buildtime) > was blocked by python task? I think they were blocked by python scripts in sandbox. ;-) -- С уважением, Епифанов Сергей