From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:00:45 +0200 From: Igor Vlasenko To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Message-ID: <20091124160010.GA19815@dad.imath.kiev.ua> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Received-SPF: pass (dad.imath.kiev.ua: domain of vlasenko@dad.imath.kiev.ua designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=dad.imath.kiev.ua; client-ip=127.0.0.1; helo=dad.imath.kiev.ua; envelope-from=vlasenko@dad.imath.kiev.ua; x-software=spfmilter 0.95 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2; Subject: Re: [devel] How to split package to three X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:00:52 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:33:06PM +0000, Max Ivanov wrote: > One package X was splitted by upstream to A B C, which depends in this > way: A <- B <- C > > I plan to add conflict on X to A, B and C and add "Provides X" to C. > Is it correct? Will apt be happy with that? I'd also add to C Obsoletes: X -- Dr. Igor Vlasenko -------------------- Topology Department Institute of Math Kiev, Ukraine