From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:52:49 +0300 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: ALT Devel discussion list Message-ID: <20091120215249.GA28276@wo.int.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: <20091120092532.GC26166@wo.int.altlinux.org> <20091120142605.GD10659@altlinux.org> <20091120144400.GB18094@wo.int.altlinux.org> <20091120151024.GE10659@altlinux.org> <20091120151654.GC18094@wo.int.altlinux.org> <20091120153348.GF10659@altlinux.org> <20091120184315.GA23675@wo.int.altlinux.org> <20091120190809.GG10659@altlinux.org> <20091120211038.GA19658@wo.int.altlinux.org> <20091120213509.GH10659@altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091120213509.GH10659@altlinux.org> X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D 3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E Subject: Re: [devel] 4.1 dead? X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:52:49 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:35:09AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:10:38AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:08:09PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:43:16PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 06:33:48PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 06:16:54PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > > > > > At least builds of two packages (util-linux and git) were broke= n due to > > > > > > this bug. So I'd better be late than sorry. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Can you please provides some more details? Did those two package= s faild > > > > > to build exactly because of malformed cache/chroot.cpio? > > > >=20 > > > > I know exactly that e.g. git build failure was due to truncated loc= ale files. > > >=20 > > > [at@people ~]$ hsh-run -- find /usr/share/locale -type f -links +1 > >=20 > > I've said nothing about translations, I mean locale files: > >=20 > > $ hsh-run -- find /usr/lib64/locale -type f -links +1 |wc -l > > 3156 > > $ hsh-run --root -- sh -c 'find /* -type f -links +1 |wc -l' > > 4036 >=20 > Okay, I assume you're reluctant to actually provide any details. Why so you assume that such tests as t3900-i18n-commit.sh and t9129-git-svn-i18n-commitencoding.sh may work properly when locale definitions are severely broken? No, I'm not going to explain so obvious things here. If you are so curious, you can create a build chroot, truncate all hardlinks there, and you'll see the breakage. Note that /etc/skel contains hardlinks but /usr/src (instantiated from there) doesn't. --=20 ldv --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksHD7EACgkQfKvmrJ41Nh7ztgCgx+ruJLVWaOa7+HZkTPSC8xRG VcIAoIVh4qVLO20s21mNcjSFb6SJAbiM =5jHW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--