From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 From: Led To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:09:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20091113172908.GA21856@dad.imath.kiev.ua> <20091114053530.GN10659@altlinux.org> <20091114074923.GT6266@wrars-comp.wrarsdomain> In-Reply-To: <20091114074923.GT6266@wrars-comp.wrarsdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200911141909.19243.ledest@gmail.com> X-Volia-Original-IP: 77.123.43.144 Subject: Re: [devel] Big ChangeLog policy X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:09:40 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Saturday, 14 November 2009 09:49:24 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 08:35:30AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > > > > In case of the robot, it can kill ChangeLog if NEWS file also exists. > > > > Who will support this proposal? > > > > > > Not I, because it is silly. > > > > How do you argue it's silly? > > I see it's rather smart. > > ChangeLog may contain something interesting and not autogenerated SCM log. > And NEWS may be empty or last changed in 2004 (for example, new authors > decided to write into ChangeLog what others write to NEWS). And NEWS may contains: "See ChangeLog" or suchlike. -- Led