From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 From: Led To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:27:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20091113172908.GA21856@dad.imath.kiev.ua> <20091113193954.GL10659@altlinux.org> <20091113201859.GA23565@dad.imath.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20091113201859.GA23565@dad.imath.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200911132227.23818.ledest@gmail.com> X-Volia-Original-IP: 77.123.43.144 Subject: Re: [devel] Big ChangeLog policy X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:27:40 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Friday, 13 November 2009 22:19:00 Igor Vlasenko wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:39:54PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > > Along with traditional ChangeLog file, which is of little use to the end > > user, many projects maintain a user-friendly (and developer-friendly) > > file called NEWS. The rule is (I hereby propose) that NEWS be packaged. > > And changelogs usually should not be packaged. > > In case of the robot, it can kill ChangeLog if NEWS file also exists. > > Who will support this proposal? Not I, because it is silly. -- Led