From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:13:38 +0300 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Message-ID: <20091029121337.GD20317@wo.int.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions References: <1256768388.8351.211.camel@dinkum-thinkum.spb.altlinux.org> <4AE966B1.5060503@altlinux.com> <20091029101423.GD3365@wo.int.altlinux.org> <200910291341.53094.serpiph@nikiet.ru> <20091029115856.GB20317@wo.int.altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091029115856.GB20317@wo.int.altlinux.org> X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D 3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E Subject: Re: [devel] runglish X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:13:38 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:58:56PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: [...] > If these people fail to understand my _primitive_ English, then they sure= ly > fail to read NEWS and ChangeLog files, they certainly cannot talk to upst= ream, > and therefore don't qualify as good package maintainers. They haven't > read good books and papers because these books (and especially papers) are > mostly written in English, so they probably do not understand code well e= nough. > If they want to be good package maintainers, then they have to learn this > "ugly language". And if they won't learn, why should I help them? I'm sure that basic English reading skills are strictly necessary to maintain packages with free software. If somebody tells me that he doesn't understand my plain English, I can answer him that I don't trust his packages by definition. --=20 ldv --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrphvEACgkQfKvmrJ41Nh70qQCeNFERvaMNC0o0jwv9T7+uyNw7 xQsAoK51q6Z8pW8uHq5O46lR+ISWdrTJ =SDM7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk--