From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lav@altlinux.ru>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lav.sp.ru
From: Vitaly Lipatov <lav@altlinux.ru>
Organization: ALT Linux Team
To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:52:52 +0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <20091016193942.GP19095@wrars-comp.wrarsdomain>
	<200910172208.31306.lav@altlinux.ru>
	<20091017191707.GA1945@altlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091017191707.GA1945@altlinux.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200910172352.53436.lav@altlinux.ru>
Subject: Re: [devel]
	=?koi8-r?b?7sUgyM/EydQg0M/e1MEg0yDOxcvP1M/S2cgg08XS18XS?=
	=?koi8-r?b?z9c=?=
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:53:11 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/200910172352.53436.lav@altlinux.ru/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

On 17 октября 2009, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:08:30PM +0400, Vitaly Lipatov wrote:
> > Например
> > http://www.etersoft.ru/content/view/179/
> > ?
>
> I wouldn't go so far to use "MUST" in such nazi way.  You
> should read RFC2821 section 3.6 more carefully.

Если речь о "or, if the host has no name, an address literal as 
described in section 4.1.1.1.", то не могу себе представить 
SMTP-сервер, не имеющий имени.

Вообще же не вижу смысла читать RFC в тот момент, когда на 
основании RFC, сложившейся практики и реальной ситуации со 
спамом сформулированы правила, позволяющие избежать спама.


-- 
С уважением,
Виталий Липатов
Санкт-Петербург
GNU! ALT Linux Team! WINE! LaTeX! LyX! http://freesource.info