From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 From: "Sergey Y. Afonin" To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:59:31 +0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <49D4568D.10904@altlinux.com> <49EEB97A.7010908@altlinux.com> <87ocupurf7.fsf@vertex.dottedmag.net> In-Reply-To: <87ocupurf7.fsf@vertex.dottedmag.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904221159.31721.asy@altlinux.ru> Subject: Re: [devel] NMU Policy X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:59:53 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Ок, тогда не massNMU-rebuild - это обычный NMU, и его отдельно описывать > не надо. Но стоит, хотябы, упомянуть. Так как на пп 1 и 2 это никак не тянет. -- С уважением, Сергей Афонин asy@altlinux.ru