From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ldv@altlinux.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:54:32 +0400
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20090416235432.GC28497@wo.int.altlinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
References: <20090416220801.GY15858@altlinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090416220801.GY15858@altlinux.org>
X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D  3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E
Subject: Re: [devel] girar-builder: post-install filelist check
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:54:32 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20090416235432.GC28497@wo.int.altlinux.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>


--KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 02:08:01AM +0400, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> Girar-builder has been enabled to perform a full-fledged check
> for unpackaged files and directories.  For example, see this log:
> http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/sisyphus-incominger/2009-April/229116=
.html
[...]
> Please don't be too eager to fix all these warnings just yet.
> For example, there is apparently no problem with /etc/rc.d/rc?.d/[KS]??*
> symbolic links, since they are under chkconfig(8) control.

There is apparently a new problem with /etc/rc.d/rc?.d/[KS]??*:
they pollute build logs.
We have to recognize these common false positives and filter them out.


--=20
ldv

--KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknnxTgACgkQfKvmrJ41Nh5FfACgw54k/wpnLFGIU0yPctqXRQ8T
N4IAoL9cocnGnaDDGSvIu9IGrNQ3YRLA
=6N7u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l--