From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <serpiph@nikiet.ru>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5
From: Epiphanov Sergei <serpiph@nikiet.ru>
To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:05:42 +0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <20090401154036.d8ab8ff6.pilot@etcnet.org>
	<20090401170720.GW13260@altlinux.org>
	<20090402010715.6c2bf151.pilot@etcnet.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090402010715.6c2bf151.pilot@etcnet.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200904021105.42349.serpiph@nikiet.ru>
X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0284], KAS30/Release
X-SpamTest-Info: Not protected
X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux Mail Server 5.6.36/RELEASE,
	bases: 20090401 #1994982, check: 20090402 clean
Subject: Re: [devel] Q: No compatible architectures found for build
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:06:30 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/200904021105.42349.serpiph@nikiet.ru/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

On Thursday 02 April 2009 01:07:15 Denis Ovsienko wrote:
> Наверное, его туда поместил dek. Меня сейчас больше интересует
> обновлённая версия программы при прочих неизменных параметрах, чем
> проталкивание пакета в архитектуру x86_64, которую я проверить всё равно
> не смогу. Использовать ExclusiveArch?

Да, использовать этот тег.

-- 
С уважением, Епифанов Сергей