From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bga@altlinux.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 22:14:48 +0400
From: "Grigory Batalov" <bga@altlinux.org>
To: devel@lists.altlinux.org
Message-Id: <20090401221448.07edcb86.bga@altlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090401170945.GA4068@wo.int.altlinux.org>
References: <20090401203853.0a8a6ba3@bga>
	<20090401170945.GA4068@wo.int.altlinux.org>
Organization: ALT Linux Team
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i586-alt-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg="PGP-SHA1";
	boundary="Signature=_Wed__1_Apr_2009_22_14_48_+0400_V=U94rDhgMY/9J1w"
Subject: Re: [devel]
 =?koi8-r?b?69XEwSDLzMHT1NggxM/Qz8zOydTFzNjO2cUgwsnOwdLO?=
 =?koi8-r?b?ycvJPw==?=
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:14:56 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20090401221448.07edcb86.bga@altlinux.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

--Signature=_Wed__1_Apr_2009_22_14_48_+0400_V=U94rDhgMY/9J1w
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 21:09:45 +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:

> > FHS-2.3 на этот вопрос не даёт чёткого ответа.
> > ----
> > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLIBLIBRARIESFORPROGRAMMINGANDPA
> >
> > /usr/lib : Libraries for programming and packages
> > Purpose
> > /usr/lib includes object files, libraries, and internal binaries that are not intended to be executed directly by users or shell scripts. [22]
> >
> > Applications may use a single subdirectory under /usr/lib. If an application uses a subdirectory, all architecture-dependent data exclusively used by the application must be placed within that subdirectory. [23]
> >
> > ...
> > /usr/lib<qual> : Alternate format libraries (optional)
> > Purpose
> > /usr/lib<qual> performs the same role as /usr/lib for an alternate binary format ...
> > ----
> >
> > unlinkd как раз из тех бинарников, что не должны запускаться непосредственно
> > пользователем. Но lib<qual> можно понимать и как lib64, и как libexec
> > (который у нас превращается в lib).
>
> Нет, /usr/lib<qual> это Alternate format *libraries*
> А когда речь идёт об *executables*, /usr/lib<qual> не при чём.
>
> Так что чёткий ответ есть: %_libexecdir/squid.

Если вчитываться дотошно, то и в %_libexecdir их не нужно класть,
потому что

> > /usr/lib : Libraries for programming and packages

Т.е. я хочу сказать, что из FHS не вижу разницы exec/не-exec.
Может быть, есть другой документ?

--Signature=_Wed__1_Apr_2009_22_14_48_+0400_V=U94rDhgMY/9J1w
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknTrx4ACgkQTSOu/blIq24y2wCdF6XBP56pJ48TcKSGjvjHIEZl
mMYAoIIJYV2MF5BKkw5X8YXqRQlksFD+
=R6/W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Wed__1_Apr_2009_22_14_48_+0400_V=U94rDhgMY/9J1w--