From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 From: Epiphanov Sergei To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:03:18 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20090303220219.GA32582@ssh.git.egro.altlinux.org> <200903051403.37612.serpiph@nikiet.ru> <20090305111703.GA16658@mw.office.seiros.ru> In-Reply-To: <20090305111703.GA16658@mw.office.seiros.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903111203.19240.serpiph@nikiet.ru> X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0284], KAS30/Release X-SpamTest-Info: Not protected X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux Mail Server 5.6.36/RELEASE, bases: 20090311 #1888539, check: 20090311 clean Subject: Re: [devel] 5.0 FAILED autopano-sift.git=2.4-alt6.M50.1 ... X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:04:04 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Thursday 05 March 2009 14:17:03 Денис Смирнов wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:03:37PM +0300, Epiphanov Sergei wrote: > ES> Подскажите, как лучше поступить, когда есть два пакета, > предоставляющие одно ES> и то же имя, но конфликтующие друг с другом? > Как-то пробегало сообщение с ES> вариантом решения именно как > ES> Provides: имя > ES> Conflicts: имя > > Что вроде этого? > > Provides: имя = %version-%release > Obsoletes: ммя < %version-%release > Conflicts: ммя < %version-%release > Conflicts: ммя > %version-%release > Написал в spec: Provides: autopano-sift Confilcts: autopano-sift < %version-%release И получил ошибку: 2009-Mar-10 23:52:03 :: task #2378 for 5.0 started: #1 build 2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2 from /people/serpiph/packages/autopano-sift-C.git 2009-Mar-10 23:52:04 :: created pkg.tar for autopano-sift-C.git tag 2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2 2009-Mar-10 23:52:05 :: [x86_64] autopano-sift-C.git 2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2: build start 2009-Mar-10 23:52:05 :: [i586] autopano-sift-C.git 2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2: build start 2009-Mar-10 23:53:40 :: [i586] autopano-sift-C.git 2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2: build OK 2009-Mar-10 23:53:43 :: [x86_64] autopano-sift-C.git 2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2: build OK 2009-Mar-10 23:53:47 :: build check OK 2009-Mar-10 23:53:48 :: plan OK 2009-Mar-10 23:53:48 :: version check OK 2009-Mar-10 23:57:25 :: dependencies check OK 2009-Mar-11 00:01:54 :: ELF symbols check OK i586: autopano-sift-C=2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2 install failed: error: failed dependencies: autopano-sift < 2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2 conflicts with autopano-sift-C-2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2 hsh-install: Packages installation failed. x86_64: autopano-sift-C=2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2 install failed: error: failed dependencies: autopano-sift < 2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2 conflicts with autopano-sift-C-2.5.0-alt1.20080723.M50.2 hsh-install: Packages installation failed. 2009-Mar-11 00:02:14 :: [i586] install check FAILED 2009-Mar-11 00:02:14 :: [x86_64] install check FAILED 2009-Mar-11 00:02:14 :: task #2378 for 5.0 FAILED Надо в Provides: указывать версию или нет? -- С уважением, Епифанов Сергей