From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:22:54 +0300 From: Alexey Tourbin To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Message-ID: <20090214212254.GJ31985@altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions References: <20090213161847.GB11969@wo.int.altlinux.org> <20090214185538.GA15638@dad.imath.kiev.ua> <20090214202304.GG31985@altlinux.org> <20090214210458.GB17284@dad.imath.kiev.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5dNcufZ4prhark0F" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090214210458.GB17284@dad.imath.kiev.ua> Subject: Re: [devel] acl file missing: a trouble for repocop X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:22:55 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --5dNcufZ4prhark0F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:04:58PM +0200, Igor Vlasenko wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:23:04PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:55:38PM +0200, Igor Vlasenko wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 07:18:47PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > > > Subject: [#874] COMPLETE sisyphus_check.git=3D0.8.9-alt1 > > > =CF=C2=CE=CF=D7=C9=CC, =DA=C1=D0=D5=D3=D4=C9=CC, > > >=20 > > > =C9 =CB=D3=D4=C1=D4=C9 =D7=D9=D4=CF=D0=D4=C1=CC =C7=D2=C1=C2=CC=C9: > > > can't open acl file /home/repocop/Sisyphus/files/list/list.src.classi= c: No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/Test/Repocop/ALT= LinuxACL.pm line > > >=20 > > > =C7=C4=C5 =D4=C5=D0=C5=D2=D8 =CD=CF=D6=CE=CF =CE=C1=CA=D4=C9 =C6=C1= =CA=CC =D4=C5=CB=D5=DD=C9=C8 acl =D7 =D7=C9=C4=C5, > > > =C4=D2=D5=D6=C5=D3=D4=D7=CE=CE=CF=CD =CB =D2=CF=C2=CF=D4=D5? > >=20 > > What kind of tests have to deal with ACL, and why do you think > > that ACL thing is important for automated post-processing? >=20 > =CF=D4=DE=C5=D4=D9 =D0=CF =D4=C5=D3=D4=C1=CD. =F3 =D2=C1=DA=C2=C9=D7=CB= =CF=CA =D3=CF=C7=CC=C1=D3=CE=CF acl. Some time ago, the only possibility for testing was post-processing. Recently, things have changed. Now there's a (still rather limited) possibility for pre-processing, PROVIDED that your checks can detect important issues and PROVIDED your code does not take too much time. That is to say, there's a real shift. Something can be a pre-condition, not a post-condition as it used to be. Here is a clue: think of how you can integrate certain parts of your code directly into girar-builder. This is not impossible. --5dNcufZ4prhark0F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmXNi4ACgkQfBKgtDjnu0bkdgCfRqbSPeNr82SZER/aRvGHf+dT tA8AnR0F8GT+8J7U+AUAfjDWb4GEKM0z =Q8or -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5dNcufZ4prhark0F--