From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 From: Led To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:29:48 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <49008511.601@altlinux.com> <200810242221.56612.ledest@gmail.com> <200810242324.12711.shrek@altlinux.ru> In-Reply-To: <200810242324.12711.shrek@altlinux.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810242229.48840.ledest@gmail.com> X-Volia-Original-IP: 77.121.19.128 Subject: Re: [devel] appArmor vs SELinux X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:27:08 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: T24gRnJpZGF5LCAyNCBPY3RvYmVyIDIwMDggMjI6MjQ6MTIgVmFsZXJ5IFYuIElub3plbXRzZXYg d3JvdGU6Cj4gPiA+ID4gPiDx8uXx7f/+8fwg8e/w7vHy/C4uLiDs7ubt7iDr6O3qIO3gIPDl6+jn 7fvpIPLg8OHu6z8KPiA+ID4gPgo+ID4gPiA+IM3l8iDzIOzl7f8g7+7kIPDz6u7pLgo+ID4gPgo+ ID4gPiDgIO3lIO/u5CDw8+ru6T8KPiA+Cj4gPiBmdHA6Ly9mdHAuwdDFxC5vcmcv4fDl5C0xLjAu dGFyLmd6Cj4KPiDoIPL7IOTz7ODl+Pwg9/LuIO/u8evlIP3y7uPuIP8g8SDy7uHu6SDh8+TzIPHl 8Pzl5+3uIPfy7iDy7iDu4fHz5uTg8vw/CgrR7vDw6Cwg7e4g7O3lIO/u6uDn4Ovu8fwsIPfy7iDy +yDt6Pfl4+4g7eUg9e735fj8IO7h8fPm5ODy/CDv7vHr5SAiW+Hw5eRdIiA6KQrfIO746OHx/z8K Cj4KPiA+ID4gPiDP7vLu7PMg6uDqOgo+ID4gPgo+ID4gPiBb4fDl5F0KCgoKLS0gCkxlZAo=