From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 From: Led To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 03:38:15 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20081001001704.019C3151C1D4@granary.armor.altlinux.org> In-Reply-To: <20081001001704.019C3151C1D4@granary.armor.altlinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810010338.16029.ledest@gmail.com> X-Volia-Original-IP: 77.121.19.128 Subject: Re: [devel] E: incoming i586 reject: kernel-image-led-tc-2.6.22-alt23 X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:36:27 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Wednesday, 01 October 2008 03:17:03 QA Team Upravdom Robot wrote: > Dear Sisyphus! > The kernel-image-led-tc-2.6.22-alt23 package has been rejected from > Sisyphus incoming for i586 architecture. > > Possible reason follows: > Executing(Requires): /bin/sh -e /usr/src/tmp/rpm-tmp.18225 > + umask 022 > + /bin/mkdir -p /usr/src/RPM/BUILD > + cd /usr/src/RPM/BUILD > + /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires > find-requires: empty file list, nothing to do > + exit 0 > Provides: kernel-doc-led =3D 2.6.22-alt23 > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <=3D 3.0.3-1, > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <=3D 4.0-1, rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= =3D > 3.0.4-1 Finding unpackaged files (using /usr/lib/rpm/check-files) > Executing(check-files): /bin/sh -e /usr/src/tmp/rpm-tmp.85913 > + umask 022 > + /bin/mkdir -p /usr/src/RPM/BUILD > + cd /usr/src/RPM/BUILD > + /usr/lib/rpm/check-files > + exit 0 > Wrote: /usr/src/RPM/RPMS/i586/kernel-image-led-tc-2.6.22-alt23.i586.rpm > Wrote: > /usr/src/RPM/RPMS/i586/kernel-modules-oss-led-tc-2.6.22-alt23.i586.rpm > Wrote: /usr/src/RPM/RPMS/i586/kernel-headers-led-tc-2.6.22-alt23.i586.rpm > Wrote: > /usr/src/RPM/RPMS/i586/kernel-headers-modules-led-tc-2.6.22-alt23.i586.rpm > Wrote: /usr/src/RPM/RPMS/noarch/kernel-doc-led-tc-2.6.22-alt23.noarch.rpm > 2142.87user 234.91system 39:58.26elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+55590551minor)pagefaults 0swaps > sisyphus_check: check-kernel ERROR: kernel module violation > /.out/kernel-modules-oss-led-tc-2.6.22-alt23.i586.rpm: package RELEASE > should end with kernel release number =D7=F2=EE =FD=F2=EE? =CF=EE=F7=E5=EC=F3 =E2 =FD=F2=EE=EC =EA=EE=ED=EA=F0=E5= =F2=ED=EE=EC =F1=EB=F3=F7=E0=E5 "package RELEASE should end with=20 kernel release number"??? > sisyphus_check: check-kernel ERROR:=20 > kernel package violation > /.out/kernel-headers-led-tc-2.6.22-alt23.i586.rpm: package GROUP should be > 'Development/Kernel' sisyphus_check: check-kernel ERROR: kernel package > violation > /.out/kernel-headers-modules-led-tc-2.6.22-alt23.i586.rpm: package GROUP > should be 'Development/Kernel' hsh-rebuild: > kernel-image-led-tc-2.6.22-alt23.src.rpm: sisyphus_check failed. =CF=EE =FD=F2=E8=EC =EF=F3=ED=EA=F2=E0=EC =E2=EE=EF=F0=EE=F1=EE=E2 =ED=E5= =F2. =2D-=20 Led