From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <at@altlinux.ru>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:01:08 +0400
From: Alexey Tourbin <at@altlinux.ru>
To: devel@lists.altlinux.org
Message-ID: <20080731150108.GH31781@solemn.turbinal>
Mail-Followup-To: devel@lists.altlinux.org
References: <20080731142110.GA25664@dad.imath.kiev.ua>
	<20080731145134.GG31781@solemn.turbinal>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIIRZ1HQ6FgrlPgb"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080731145134.GG31781@solemn.turbinal>
Subject: Re: [devel] repocop: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:01:09 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20080731150108.GH31781@solemn.turbinal/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>


--WIIRZ1HQ6FgrlPgb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:51:34PM +0400, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> > =C1 =D4=CF =D1 =C2=D9=CC=CF =D7=CB=CC=C0=DE=C9=CC =D7 =D2=C5=D0=CF=CB=
=CF=D0=C5 =D2=D5=C7=C1=CE=D8
> >  arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 	 The package has a significant
> >  amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an
> >  architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and
> >  bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one
> >  for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not
> >  architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case,
>=20
> I wouldn't go so far as to call it a violation.

Oh, having architecture-dependent data in /usr/share surely is one.

--WIIRZ1HQ6FgrlPgb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiR07QACgkQfBKgtDjnu0b5pgCgyrn2qPX0MZ470T4CZJthH3as
rsMAoOVcIjONfdt4pdABicm13E9Oy98Z
=T4tm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--WIIRZ1HQ6FgrlPgb--