From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 12:21:00 +0400 From: "Anton V. Boyarshinov" To: devel@lists.altlinux.org Message-Id: <20080530122100.2666afc1.boyarsh@altlinux.org> In-Reply-To: <20080529123846.GM7996@solemn.turbinal> References: <20080529123846.GM7996@solemn.turbinal> Organization: ALTLinux X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.12.8; x86_64-alt-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [devel] rpm: rsyncable deflate vs LZMA X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 08:21:00 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: > 1) Включить LZMA_Alone сжатие, забив на rsyncability. > 2) Вернуться к идее rsyncable deflate. Мне, как человеку, собирающему болванки, на которые вечно ничего не помещается, кажется более привлекательным вариантом LZMA_Alone. Антон