From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:07:18 +0300 From: "Anton V. Boyarshinov" To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Message-Id: <20071217160718.87757933.boyarsh@altlinux.org> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: ALTLinux X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; x86_64-alt-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [devel] mkimage using X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:11:04 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: > The following packages will be REMOVED: > altlinux-release-server > The following NEW packages will be installed: > ... altlinux-release-desktop ... > WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed > This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing! > altlinux-release-server (due to basesystem) > E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes > > В профиле rescue явно прописан altlinux-release-desktop. Что в данном > случае правильнее: править mkimage на предмет --force-yes (или это не > его, а hasher, например, надо править?) или иначе писать профили? В данном случае, без custom apt.conf, похоже, не обойтись. Хорошего решения этой проблемы пока не придумано (а появилась она недавно)