From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <victor@gu.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:08:08 +0300
From: Victor Forsyuk <force@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20070924120808.GA2083@mail.gu.net>
References: <20070923194144.GA16076@hint1.office.altlinux.org>
	<9713cfcc0709231250y14458f5eu93eada627dce3bd8@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <9713cfcc0709231250y14458f5eu93eada627dce3bd8@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: Victor Forsyuk <victor@gu.net>
Subject: [devel] =?koi8-r?b?bmFzbSDTINDPxMTF0tbLz8ogNjQgwsnU?=
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:08:10 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20070924120808.GA2083@mail.gu.net/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 10:50:53PM +0300, Led <led@altlinux.ru> wrote:
> 2007/9/23, QA Team Robot <qa@altlinux.org>:
> >         22 UPDATED packages
> >
> > SDL - Simple DirectMedia Layer
> > * Mon Sep 17 2007 Valery Inozemtsev <shrek@altlinux> 1.2.12-alt3
> > - require nasm for building only on %ix86 and x86_64
> > * Fri Aug 17 2007 Valery Inozemtsev <shrek@altlinux> 1.2.12-alt2
> 
> С каких это пор nasm поддерживает x86_64?:)

С версии 0.99.00. Я как раз собрал 0.99.03 и собираюсь отправить его в
Сизиф. Никто не против? По идее в 32-битной части никакой регрессии быть не
должно, в 0.99 ветке в основном полируется 64-битная поддержка.

Мнение апстрима:
0.99.02 - We think this one works. Consider it beta.
0.99.03 - sse5! Should probably still be considered beta.

Заливать?