Re: [devel] perl-Image-MetaData-JPEG-0.15-alt1: i586 rebuild failed [1]

[Victor Forsyuk <force@altlinux.org>]

Привет,

On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:53:50PM +0400, QA Team Robot <qa@altlinux.org> wrote:
> Package: perl-Image-MetaData-JPEG-0.15-alt1
> Packager: Victor Forsyuk <force@altlinux>
> Status: i586 rebuild failed.
> Cannot build this package for 1 week(s) (since Mon Mar 19 2007).
> Please investigate.
> 
> Why:
> 
> #     undef
> #         ne
> #     undef
> Can't call method "get_app13_data" on an undefined value at t/JPEG_4_app13_set.t line 144.
> # Looks like you planned 53 tests but only ran 18.
> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 18 run.
> # Looks like your test died just after 18.
> dubious
> 	Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
> DIED. FAILED tests 18-53
> 	Failed 36/53 tests, 32.08% okay
> t/JPEG_5_exif..............# Testing APP1 Exif data routines
> ok
> t/JPEG_5_exif_GPS..........# Testing APP1 Exif data routines (GPS_DATA)
> Modification of a read-only value attempted at /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/Image-MetaData-JPEG-0.15/blib/lib/Image/MetaData/JPEG.pm line 134.
> 
> #   Failed test 'Write and reread works'
> #   at t/JPEG_5_exif_GPS.t line 101.
> #     Structures begin differing at:
> #          $got = undef
> #     $expected = ARRAY(0x835c250)
> Can't call method "get_description" on unblessed reference at t/JPEG_5_exif_GPS.t line 105.
> # Looks like you planned 47 tests but only ran 12.
> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 12 run.
> # Looks like your test died just after 12.
> dubious
> 	Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
> DIED. FAILED tests 12-47
> 	Failed 36/47 tests, 23.40% okay
> t/JPEG_5_exif_IFD..........# Testing APP1 Exif data routines (IFD01_DATA)
> Modification of a read-only value attempted at /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/Image-MetaData-JPEG-0.15/blib/lib/Image/MetaData/JPEG.pm line 134.

И так далее.

Как видно, с тестами начались проблемы при пересборке 19 марта. На других
машинах с более старым перлом этот модуль собирается и работает. Мне ничего
не остается, кроме как предположить, что в сделанной накануне поломки сборке
perl-5.8.8-alt7 что-то было поломано или добавлено какое-то backward
incompatible изменение.

Дальше следует известный русский вопрос... :)