From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Pavlov Konstantin Organization: ALT Linux Team To: ALT Devel discussion list Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:35:38 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061003140111.CAA5EF6CE@mash.office.altlinux.ru> <200610031920.45614.icesik@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <200610031920.45614.icesik@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5591557.kznV1ADqKs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200610032035.43013.thresh@altlinux.ru> Subject: Re: [devel] E: incoming x86_64 reject: fusepak-0.4-alt1 X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9rc1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:35:50 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --nextPart5591557.kznV1ADqKs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 03 October 2006 20:20, Igor Zubkov wrote: > =F7 =D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=C9 =CF=D4 3 =CF=CB=D4=D1=C2=D2=D1 2006 17:01= Upravdom Team Robot =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC(a): > > Dear Igor Zubkov (ALTLinux Team) ! > > The fusepak-0.4-alt1 package has been rejected from incoming for x86_64 > > architecture. > > > > Possible reason follows: > > GNU/Linux ld.so > > checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate > > appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool > > checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes > > checking whether to build shared libraries... yes > > checking whether to build static libraries... yes > > checking for x86_64-alt-linux-g77 option to produce PIC... -fPIC > > checking if x86_64-alt-linux-g77 PIC flag -fPIC works... yes > > checking if x86_64-alt-linux-g77 static flag -static works... no > > checking if x86_64-alt-linux-g77 supports -c -o file.o... yes > > checking whether the x86_64-alt-linux-g77 linker (/usr/bin/ld -m > > elf_x86_64) supports shared libraries... yes checking dynamic linker > > characteristics... cat: /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf: No such file or > > directory GNU/Linux ld.so > > checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate > > checking for fuse_main in -lfuse... yes > > checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes > > checking fuse/fuse.h usability... no > > checking fuse/fuse.h presence... no > > checking for fuse/fuse.h... no > > configure: error: Unable to find fuse.h > > error: > > > > RPM build errors: > > Bad exit status from /usr/src/tmp/rpm-tmp.30381 (%build) > > Bad exit status from /usr/src/tmp/rpm-tmp.30381 (%build) > > 2.38user 1.66system 1:20.30elapsed 5%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > > 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+887481minor)pagefaults 0swaps > > rebuild: rebuild of `fusepak-0.4-alt1.src.rpm' failed. > > removed `/tmp/.private/bee3/lockdir/pid' > > removed directory: `/tmp/.private/bee3/lockdir' > > =EE=C5 =D0=CF=CE=D1=CC. =E1 =DC=D4=CF =DE=D4=CF =D4=C1=CB=CF=C5: > [icesik@salto ~]$ > rpm -qpl > /raid/ALT/Sisyphus/x86_64/RPMS.classic/libfuse-devel-2.5.3-alt1.x86_64.rpm > /usr/include/fuse > /usr/include/fuse.h > /usr/include/fuse/fuse.h > /usr/include/fuse/fuse_common.h > /usr/include/fuse/fuse_compat.h > /usr/include/fuse/fuse_lowlevel.h > /usr/include/fuse/fuse_lowlevel_compat.h > /usr/include/fuse/fuse_opt.h > /usr/lib64/libfuse.so > /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/fuse.pc > [icesik@salto ~]$ config.log =D0=CF=D3=CD=CF=D4=D2=C9. =2D-=20 Pavlov Konstantin, ALT Linux Team, VideoLAN Team, jid: thresh@altlinux.org --nextPart5591557.kznV1ADqKs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFIpFeR0cP4/qrkIQRAgqtAJ49ynVR5FsoW0WDSKK/OgHmKNC2SACeJVQr e1nt1knLUfTPckbYrK74f48= =Fop9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5591557.kznV1ADqKs--