Re: [devel] libfvh-2.5-alt1: rebuild failed [24]

Re: [devel] libfvh-2.5-alt1: rebuild failed [24]

[Alexey Tourbin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 782 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 02:41:42PM +0400, QA Team Robot wrote:
> Package: libfvh-2.5-alt1
> Packager: Vyacheslav Dikonov <slava@altlinux>

> ar -r libfvh.a io.o proc.o ssl.o str.o utils.o val.o tcp.o snd_dev.o snd_util.o ip.o mail.o mem.o main.o
> ar: creating libfvh.a
> ld -x -shared -soname libfvh.so.2 -o libfvh.so.2.5 --whole-archive libfvh.a

> verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/lib/libfvh.so.2.5: undefined symbol: stderr
> verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/lib/libfvh.so.2.5: undefined symbol: strcpy
> verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/lib/libfvh.so.2.5: undefined symbol: log
> verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/lib/libfvh.so.2.5: undefined symbol: ioctl
> verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/lib/libfvh.so.2.5: undefined symbol: popen

Надо переложить ld куда-нибудь в libexec, чтобы им не линковались.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [devel] libfvh-2.5-alt1: rebuild failed [24]

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 339 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 12:24:31PM +0400, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> Надо переложить ld куда-нибудь в libexec, чтобы им не линковались.
Зачем?

-- 
WBR, wRAR (ALT Linux Team)
Powered by the ALT Linux fortune(8):

Хотя в 2.6-mm его [aic7xxx] всё-таки стали чинить, в результате, как
обычно, сначала сломали ;)
		-- vsu in hardware@

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]