From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 01:24:54 +0400 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: ALT Devel discussion list Message-ID: <20060512212454.GB11360@basalt.office.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: <4464DD3E.6040203@altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464DD3E.6040203@altlinux.org> X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D 3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E Subject: Re: [devel] [Fwd: [(nowhere)] fopen() calls __open] X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:24:54 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:08:46PM +0400, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > =E9=CE=D4=C5=D2=C5=D3=CE=C1=D1 =C4=C9=D3=CB=D5=D3=D3=C9=D1 =D0=CF =D0=CF= =D7=CF=C4=D5 =D4=CF=C7=CF, =CB=C1=CB =C4=C5=CC=C1=D4=D8 "=D0=C5=D2=C5=CB=D2= =D9=D4=C9=D1" =C6=C1=CA=CC=CF=D7=D9=C8=20 > =CF=D0=C5=D2=C1=C3=C9=CA =C4=CC=D1 glibc. =F7 =D3=D7=C5=D4=C5 =C2=CC=C9= =D6=CE=C5=C7=CF =C9 =D3=D2=C5=C4=CE=C5=C7=CF =C2=D5=C4=D5=DD=C5=C7=CF =CF s= mbsh =C9=20 > =C1=CE=C1=CC=CF=C7=C1=C8, =D0=CF=C8=CF=D6=C5, =D0=D2=C9=C4=C5=D4=D3=D1 = =DA=C1=C2=D9=D4=D8. =F7=D3=C5 =D6=C5, autofs/automount =C2=CF=CC=C5=C5=20 > =C7=D2=C1=CD=CF=D4=CE=D9=CA =D0=CF=C4=C8=CF=C4. =FC=D4=CF =D3=CB=CF=D2=C5=C5 =CE=C5 =C4=C9=D3=CB=D5=D3=D3=C9=D1, =C1 FAQ. > Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:43:08 -0700 > From: Ulrich Drepper > To: Derrell.Lipman@UnwiredUniverse.com > CC: libc-alpha@sourceware.org > Subject: Re: fopen() calls __open() > Message-ID: <445102AC.5090505@redhat.com> > References: <4450F946.6030909@redhat.= com> > <8xprx810.fsf@oberon-mail.internal> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=3D"=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D-=3D-=3D" >=20 > --=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D-=3D-=3D > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dutf-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >=20 > Derrell.Lipman@UnwiredUniverse.com wrote: > > I'm a bit confused as to why certain functions are weak and allowed to = be > > overridden (e.g. open, __open) >=20 > Forget about weak. The is no difference in the treatment of weak and > strong symbols when they are defined in DSOs. They are all the same. > The aspect interesting for you is exported or not. No internal libc > call except those to the malloc functions references names which are > exported. --=20 ldv --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEZP0mfKvmrJ41Nh4RAgy6AKCgmI8utaXfWpeTjeBeQ828XV223ACeMEfl FRgEXdKRPK2ZdRtLxwTyv/Y= =0YUH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8--