From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:40:18 +0300 From: "Anton D. Kachalov" To: ALT Devel discussion list Subject: Re: [devel] I: Static Linking Considered Harmful Message-ID: <20050219134018.GA15889@lrn.ru> References: <20050218235915.GA29423@basalt.office.altlinux.org> <20050219121803.GA23233@lrn.ru> <20050219124622.GA2204@basalt.office.altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050219124622.GA2204@basalt.office.altlinux.org> X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:40:18 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:46:22PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:18:03PM +0300, Anton D. Kachalov wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 02:59:15AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > > "For all those people who think static linking is good. > > > Read and then think again." > > > > > > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/no_static_linking.html > > Чё-то я этого не догнал: > > "tools and hacks like ltrace, LD_PRELOAD, LD_PROFILE don't work." > > Как это понимать? По-моему, прекрасно работает с динамическими либами. > > Да, в отличие от статических. А то, что их (библиотечки) можно подменить (левыми) он (автор) не в курсе? Rgds, Anton