From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:05:14 +0300 From: Grigory Batalov To: devel@altlinux.ru Message-Id: <20041217150514.75f5d02f.bga@altlinux.ru> Organization: ALT Linux Team X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-alt-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at tepkom.ru with clamav Subject: [devel] =?koi8-r?b?68HLINPPwsnSwdTY?= -static =?koi8-r?b?0MHLxdTZPw==?= X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:05:16 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Здравствуйте! Посоветуйте, как правильно (не) собирать -devel-static пакеты? Я нашёл два варианта: --- %if_with static %files devel-static ... %endif --- rpmbuild -bb --with static --target i586 mycool.spec или --- %if_enabled static %files devel-static ... %endif --- rpmbuild -bb --enable static --target i586 mycool.spec Какой из них (или другой) правильнее?