В сообщении от Четверг 30 Сентябрь 2004 13:54 ALT QA Team Robot 
написал(a):
> Hi,
>
> This is experimental sisyphus_check v2.0.1.
> I will run only test "spec-name".
>
> Description for test "spec-name":
>  check specfile name; specfile should be named after package name
> (name.spec)

[...]

> Sisyphus/files/SRPMS/uqm-bin-0.3-alt1.src.rpm
> Warning(spec-name): uqm_bin.spec
> Sisyphus/files/SRPMS/uqm-content-0.3-alt2.src.rpm
> Warning(spec-name): uqm_content.spec
> Sisyphus/files/SRPMS/uqm-remix-pack1-1.0-alt2.src.rpm
> Warning(spec-name): uqm_remix_pack1.spec
> Sisyphus/files/SRPMS/uqm-remix-pack2-1.0-alt2.src.rpm
> Warning(spec-name): uqm_remix_pack2.spec
> Sisyphus/files/SRPMS/uqm-remix-pack3-1.0-alt1.src.rpm
> Warning(spec-name): uqm_remix_pack3.spec
> Sisyphus/files/SRPMS/uqm-voice-0.3-alt2.src.rpm
> Warning(spec-name): uqm_voice.spec
В чем проблема?
Мне так удобно именовать.

-- 
Regards, Sergey, ALT Linux Team, http://www.altlinux.ru
http://stinkfoot.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1C2A3F08