From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:03:11 +0300 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: ALT Devel discussion list Subject: Re: [devel] Re: Buildreq: =?koi8-r?Q?gcc3?= =?koi8-r?B?LjIt0ysrIMnMyWdjYy1jKys=?= = 3.2 Message-ID: <20040209120311.GA21338@basalt.office.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-fingerprint: 9658 398D 181B 1200 8FC5 26B8 F6F8 846B C1E2 3429 X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 01:53:01PM +0300, Dimitry V. Ketov wrote: > > > На gcc3.2 точно нельзя делать зависимость. > > > > А почему об этом не говорилось? У меня в минимум одном спеке > > так и зафиксировано. > И все-таки, заново поднимая вопрос _куда_ ее делать? > Чем плохо gcc-c++ = 3.2? Ничем не плохо. -- ldv --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAJ3b/9viEa8HiNCkRAo4CAJ4xBce7pT+HiBHtx0xzhfb53MktdQCfYCxP L+wowiVxFBCLUZtiA/p8kps= =ddAK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: ALT Devel discussion list Subject: Re: [devel] Re: Buildreq: =?koi8-r?Q?gcc3?= =?koi8-r?B?LjIt0ysrIMnMyWdjYy1jKys=?= = 3.2 Message-ID: <20040209120311.GA21338@basalt.office.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-fingerprint: 9658 398D 181B 1200 8FC5 26B8 F6F8 846B C1E2 3429 X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 X-Original-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:03:11 +0300 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:03:16 -0000 Message-ID: <20040209120316.cqyujDm_J8mcu5NRnCYjKdooX-RnN9Y2RbyPtLjhkj0@z> Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 01:53:01PM +0300, Dimitry V. Ketov wrote: > > > На gcc3.2 точно нельзя делать зависимость. > > > > А почему об этом не говорилось? У меня в минимум одном спеке > > так и зафиксировано. > И все-таки, заново поднимая вопрос _куда_ ее делать? > Чем плохо gcc-c++ = 3.2? Ничем не плохо. -- ldv --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAJ3b/9viEa8HiNCkRAo4CAJ4xBce7pT+HiBHtx0xzhfb53MktdQCfYCxP L+wowiVxFBCLUZtiA/p8kps= =ddAK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--