From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:31:31 +0300 From: Alexey Tourbin To: ALT Devel discussion list Message-ID: <20040206133131.GQ7324@solemn.turbinal.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: <20040206040834.GF7324@solemn.turbinal.org> <20040206112430.2242126f.vyt@vzljot.ru> <20040206130144.GN7324@solemn.turbinal.org> <20040206132024.GR14395@osdn.org.ua> <200402061327.i16DREvD027846@antex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402061327.i16DREvD027846@antex.ru> Subject: [devel] Re: Q: aumix: gtk1 vs gtk2 X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:33:09 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:27:14PM +0300, Sergey Pinaev wrote: > MS> - gtk2 "тяжелее" (Xft, proper(?) i18n); > Не "тяжелее" оно. Точнее "не сильно тяжелее". Намного тяжелее в смысле startup costs. --eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAI5czfBKgtDjnu0YRAi70AJoDOIVKssnWR7MMFgxgu8WVNlSkGACfW+FZ LXg0XxVKUMmhgbec/vTzlKA= =rc8i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Alexey Tourbin To: ALT Devel discussion list Message-ID: <20040206133131.GQ7324@solemn.turbinal.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: <20040206040834.GF7324@solemn.turbinal.org> <20040206112430.2242126f.vyt@vzljot.ru> <20040206130144.GN7324@solemn.turbinal.org> <20040206132024.GR14395@osdn.org.ua> <200402061327.i16DREvD027846@antex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402061327.i16DREvD027846@antex.ru> Subject: [devel] Re: Q: aumix: gtk1 vs gtk2 X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:33:09 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:33:09 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:33:09 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:33:09 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:33:09 -0000 X-Original-Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:31:31 +0300 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:33:09 -0000 Message-ID: <20040206133309.0c5ye_U33tgRTAMIYdFVSFcvc92iC3Aaj0TrIeY88-k@z> Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:27:14PM +0300, Sergey Pinaev wrote: > MS> - gtk2 "тяжелее" (Xft, proper(?) i18n); > Не "тяжелее" оно. Точнее "не сильно тяжелее". Намного тяжелее в смысле startup costs. --eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAI5czfBKgtDjnu0YRAi70AJoDOIVKssnWR7MMFgxgu8WVNlSkGACfW+FZ LXg0XxVKUMmhgbec/vTzlKA= =rc8i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD--