From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ldv@altlinux.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 20:44:49 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
Subject: Re: [devel] Re: alsa-tools-1.0.1-alt1: rebuild failed
Message-ID: <20040120174449.GA2717@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
References: <20040120163038.AB02B24CB3@julia.office.altlinux.ru>
	<20040120163755.GG14779@osdn.org.ua>
	<20040120164256.GB7137@master.mivlgu.local>
	<20040120164522.GA1351@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
	<20040120165947.GC7137@master.mivlgu.local>
	<20040120171229.GC2219@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
	<20040120172659.GI2013@pyro.hopawar.private.net>
	<20040120172755.GB2519@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
	<20040120174037.GK2013@pyro.hopawar.private.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040120174037.GK2013@pyro.hopawar.private.net>
X-fingerprint: 9658 398D 181B 1200 8FC5  26B8 F6F8 846B C1E2 3429
X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list <devel.altlinux.ru>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:44:50 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20040120174449.GA2717@basalt.office.altlinux.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>


--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:40:37PM +0600, Alexey Morozov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:27:55PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > Вряд ли она "неудовлетворенная". Насколько я понимаю,
> > > Provides: smth
> > > 
> > > с точки зрения rpm эквивалентна
> > > 
> > > Provides: smth = %version
> > С каких это пор?
> Да, Вы правы, неэквивалентна. Значит, нужно править спеки ядреных
> пакетов.

Не только.  Ещё и rpmbuild надо править.


-- 
ldv

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFADWkR9viEa8HiNCkRAtyJAKCGBt5kfTKBja98uhDUOGxm3BLhsQCfcSiH
euZi72blzwbOwwVLvuZuYHk=
=9A7e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--