From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <alex@pyro.hopawar.private.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 23:40:37 +0600
From: Alexey Morozov <alex-altlinux@idisys.iae.nsk.su>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
Subject: Re: [devel] Re: alsa-tools-1.0.1-alt1: rebuild failed
Message-ID: <20040120174037.GK2013@pyro.hopawar.private.net>
References: <20040120163038.AB02B24CB3@julia.office.altlinux.ru>
	<20040120163755.GG14779@osdn.org.ua>
	<20040120164256.GB7137@master.mivlgu.local>
	<20040120164522.GA1351@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
	<20040120165947.GC7137@master.mivlgu.local>
	<20040120171229.GC2219@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
	<20040120172659.GI2013@pyro.hopawar.private.net>
	<20040120172755.GB2519@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r4QXMf6/kyF/FvJJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040120172755.GB2519@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list <devel.altlinux.ru>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:40:39 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20040120174037.GK2013@pyro.hopawar.private.net/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>


--r4QXMf6/kyF/FvJJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:27:55PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > Вряд ли она "неудовлетворенная". Насколько я понимаю,
> > Provides: smth
> > 
> > с точки зрения rpm эквивалентна
> > 
> > Provides: smth = %version
> С каких это пор?
Да, Вы правы, неэквивалентна. Значит, нужно править спеки ядреных
пакетов.

--r4QXMf6/kyF/FvJJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFADWgVX5DZdJn19V0RAhRGAJ0Zm00fWXnfcfE2Ru0OQnGj0+SiBACgmpys
V9RuI7wmYxgi7w0flkM1c7s=
=eBK1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--r4QXMf6/kyF/FvJJ--