Re: [devel] Q: lt_cv_cc_static_works=no

["Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1109 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:49:55AM +0300, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> Обсуждали с taniwha на IRC последнюю проблему с libtool и
> статическими библиотеками.  Вот частичный лог:
> 
>  * raorn wonders, will it work with lt_cv_prog_cc_static_works=no....
> <raorn> hm... grep says, lt_cv_prog_cc_static_works=no will work...
> <taniwha> you really shouldn't be messing with that
> <taniwha> just configure with --disable-static
> <taniwha> for one thing, that only affects linking
> <raorn> taniwha: i'm afraid, this export will be included in
>         %configure rpm macro some day...
> <taniwha> if that happens, dump rpm
> <taniwha> or patch rpm to remove /any/ such export
> <raorn> as far as i can see
> <raorn> if it will cause any problems, rpm will be fixed ;-)
> <taniwha> still, why not do the sane thing and just use the
>           options to configure?
> 
> Вот действительно, зачем это нужно?

Это равносильно неустановке пакета glibc-devel-static.
Нужно это для того, чтобы в системе, где glibc-devel-static установлен,
buildreq не включал его в сборочные зависимости без необходимости.


-- 
ldv

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]