From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:39:28 +0400 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: ALT Devel discussion list Subject: Re: [devel] PreReq question Message-ID: <20030930173928.GA30314@basalt.office.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: <3F79BDFC.2090609@altlinux.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F79BDFC.2090609@altlinux.ru> X-fingerprint: 9658 398D 181B 1200 8FC5 26B8 F6F8 846B C1E2 3429 X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:39:30 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:31:40PM +0400, Nikita Gergel wrote: > Приветствую! > Будет ли правильным писать в PreReq пакеты типа libol-devel-static? > Как-то странно мне кажется это звучит... Может есть более красивый > метод? Программе для успешной компиляции в обяз порядке нужен > libol-devel-static. libol-devel-static не должен быть нужен для сборки. -- ldv --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/eb/Q9viEa8HiNCkRAp2GAJ4oiTm8537MWRnYdNs+O+B3fZBn5ACdGyOF LqS68gZ5UiAOUnpoc7+cOkU= =07et -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs--