* Re: [devel] Пакеты, которые не пересобрались (Sisyphus.base)
@ 2003-07-01 10:51 ` Alexander Bokovoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Bokovoy @ 2003-07-01 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ALT Devel discussion list
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:34:21PM +0400, Anton Farygin wrote:
> | Странно, у меня несколько другая статиcтика:
> | 5202 Jun 30 22:42 SysVinit-2.85-alt5
> | 1915 Jul 1 00:21 dosfstools-2.8-alt2
> | 183434 Jul 1 01:50 gettext-0.11.5-alt12
> | 2331 Jul 1 03:44 hwclock-2.19-alt1
> | 2792 Jul 1 03:50 iproute2-2.4.7-alt4.ss010824
> | 23577 Jul 1 03:52 iptables-1.2.7a-alt1
> | 2407 Jul 1 03:53 iputils-20020927-alt1
> | 3302 Jul 1 03:58 jfsprogs-1.1.0-alt1
> | 1734 Jul 1 04:06 ldetect-0.4.7-alt1
> | 431 Jul 1 04:27 libdm-2.0.5-alt1
> | 22420 Jul 1 04:43 libtool-2:1.4.2-alt0.2
> | 4272 Jul 1 04:54 lilo-22.4.1-alt3
> | 7097 Jul 1 05:04 lvm-1.0.6-alt2
> | 2319 Jul 1 05:26 minicom-2.00.0-alt6
> | 947 Jul 1 06:29 pam-0.75-alt21
> | 19067 Jul 1 07:06 postfix-1:1.1.12-alt2
> | 12515 Jul 1 07:21 quota-2:3.08-alt1
> | 9346 Jul 1 07:26 reiserfs-utils-1:3.6.4-alt1
> | 4135 Jul 1 08:08 sysklogd-1.4.1-alt14
> | 911 Jul 1 08:12 tcb-0.9.8.5-alt1
> | 2977 Jul 1 08:21 traceroute-1.4a12-alt5
> | 11053 Jul 1 08:25 urlview-0.9-ipl7mdk
>
> Я пересобирал на SKIF'е.
Интересно, _как_ должно было случиться это различие при пересборке в BTE?
При условии использования одного и того же репозитария, конечно.
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
---
They have been at a great feast of languages, and stolen the scraps.
-- William Shakespeare, "Love's Labour's Lost"
>From ldv@altlinux.org Tue Jul 1 14:55:38 2003
Return-Path: <ldv@altlinux.org>
Delivered-To: devel@lrn.ru
Received: from master.altlinux.ru (master.altlinux.ru [62.118.250.235])
by lrn.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016FF48205
for <devel@lrn.ru>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:55:37 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from basalt.office.altlinux.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by master.altlinux.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CDCE31CF
for <devel@altlinux.ru>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:55:37 +0400 (MSD)
Received: by basalt.office.altlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 4391241A; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:55:35 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:55:35 +0400
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
Subject: Re: [devel] =?koi8-r?B?8MHLxdTZLCDLz9TP?=
=?koi8-r?B?0tnFIM7FINDF0sXTz8LSwczJ09g=?= (Sisyphus.base)
Message-ID: <20030701105535.GF16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
References: <3F013410.3050703@altlinux.com>
<20030701103437.GA16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
<3F0163AD.2090608@altlinux.com> <20030701105134.GC5308@sam-solutions.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bGR76rFJjkSxVeRa"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030701105134.GC5308@sam-solutions.net>
X-fingerprint: 9658 398D 181B 1200 8FC5 26B8 F6F8 846B C1E2 3429
X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list <devel.altlinux.ru>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 10:55:38 -0000
--bGR76rFJjkSxVeRa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:51:34PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:34:21PM +0400, Anton Farygin wrote:
> > | Странно, у меня несколько другая статиcтика:
> > | 5202 Jun 30 22:42 SysVinit-2.85-alt5
> > | 1915 Jul 1 00:21 dosfstools-2.8-alt2
> > | 183434 Jul 1 01:50 gettext-0.11.5-alt12
> > | 2331 Jul 1 03:44 hwclock-2.19-alt1
> > | 2792 Jul 1 03:50 iproute2-2.4.7-alt4.ss010824
> > | 23577 Jul 1 03:52 iptables-1.2.7a-alt1
> > | 2407 Jul 1 03:53 iputils-20020927-alt1
> > | 3302 Jul 1 03:58 jfsprogs-1.1.0-alt1
> > | 1734 Jul 1 04:06 ldetect-0.4.7-alt1
> > | 431 Jul 1 04:27 libdm-2.0.5-alt1
> > | 22420 Jul 1 04:43 libtool-2:1.4.2-alt0.2
> > | 4272 Jul 1 04:54 lilo-22.4.1-alt3
> > | 7097 Jul 1 05:04 lvm-1.0.6-alt2
> > | 2319 Jul 1 05:26 minicom-2.00.0-alt6
> > | 947 Jul 1 06:29 pam-0.75-alt21
> > | 19067 Jul 1 07:06 postfix-1:1.1.12-alt2
> > | 12515 Jul 1 07:21 quota-2:3.08-alt1
> > | 9346 Jul 1 07:26 reiserfs-utils-1:3.6.4-alt1
> > | 4135 Jul 1 08:08 sysklogd-1.4.1-alt14
> > | 911 Jul 1 08:12 tcb-0.9.8.5-alt1
> > | 2977 Jul 1 08:21 traceroute-1.4a12-alt5
> > | 11053 Jul 1 08:25 urlview-0.9-ipl7mdk
> >
> > Я пересобирал на SKIF'е.
> Интересно, _как_ должно было случиться это различие при пересборке в BTE?
> При условии использования одного и того же репозитария, конечно.
Использовались разные средства пересборки + немного отличающиеся репозитарии.
--
ldv
--bGR76rFJjkSxVeRa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/AWin9viEa8HiNCkRAu9fAJ0TaSKpu0dA+m2pSUVAe7aiCPr/9gCeMR4g
Lns9BQ2PIeSOpuoep/Rn4cI=
=00ik
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--bGR76rFJjkSxVeRa--
>From a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net Tue Jul 1 14:58:06 2003
Return-Path: <a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net>
Delivered-To: devel@lrn.ru
Received: from master.altlinux.ru (master.altlinux.ru [62.118.250.235])
by lrn.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E4F48205
for <devel@lrn.ru>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:58:06 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from mail.belcaf.minsk.by (mail.sam-solutions.net [217.21.35.41])
by master.altlinux.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56B5E31D0
for <devel@altlinux.ru>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:58:04 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from pc152.belcaf.minsk.by ([192.168.111.180]) by
mail.belcaf.minsk.by (MTA 4.15) with ESMTP id HHCEGR00.UCX for
<devel@altlinux.ru>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:58:03 +0300
Received: by pc152.belcaf.minsk.by (Postfix, from userid 501)
id AC493205ED; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:57:57 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:57:57 +0300
From: Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
Subject: Re: [devel] =?koi8-r?B?8MHLxdTZLCDLz9TP?=
=?koi8-r?B?0tnFIM7FINDF0sXTz8LSwczJ09g=?= (Sisyphus.base)
Message-ID: <20030701105757.GD5308@sam-solutions.net>
Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
References: <3F013410.3050703@altlinux.com>
<20030701103437.GA16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
<3F0163AD.2090608@altlinux.com> <20030701105134.GC5308@sam-solutions.net>
<20030701105535.GF16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20030701105535.GF16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list <devel.altlinux.ru>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 10:58:07 -0000
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:55:35PM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > | 4135 Jul 1 08:08 sysklogd-1.4.1-alt14
> > > | 911 Jul 1 08:12 tcb-0.9.8.5-alt1
> > > | 2977 Jul 1 08:21 traceroute-1.4a12-alt5
> > > | 11053 Jul 1 08:25 urlview-0.9-ipl7mdk
> > >
> > > Я пересобирал на SKIF'е.
> > Интересно, _как_ должно было случиться это различие при пересборке в BTE?
> > При условии использования одного и того же репозитария, конечно.
>
> Использовались разные средства пересборки + немного отличающиеся репозитарии.
Так кому же верить в таком случае? Чей репозитарий был более
авторитативен? :)
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
---
When I was 16, I thought there was no hope for my father. By the time I was
20, he had made great improvement.
>From ldv@altlinux.org Tue Jul 1 14:59:38 2003
Return-Path: <ldv@altlinux.org>
Delivered-To: devel@lrn.ru
Received: from master.altlinux.ru (master.altlinux.ru [62.118.250.235])
by lrn.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512FE4828E
for <devel@lrn.ru>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:59:38 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from basalt.office.altlinux.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by master.altlinux.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAE2E31D6
for <devel@altlinux.ru>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:59:37 +0400 (MSD)
Received: by basalt.office.altlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 501)
id CB8C941A; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:59:36 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:59:36 +0400
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
Subject: Re: [devel] =?koi8-r?B?8MHLxdTZLCDLz9TP?=
=?koi8-r?B?0tnFIM7FINDF0sXTz8LSwczJ09g=?= (Sisyphus.base)
Message-ID: <20030701105936.GG16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
References: <3F013410.3050703@altlinux.com>
<20030701103437.GA16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
<3F0163AD.2090608@altlinux.com> <20030701105134.GC5308@sam-solutions.net>
<20030701105535.GF16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
<20030701105757.GD5308@sam-solutions.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7uYPyRQQ5N0D02nI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030701105757.GD5308@sam-solutions.net>
X-fingerprint: 9658 398D 181B 1200 8FC5 26B8 F6F8 846B C1E2 3429
X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list <devel.altlinux.ru>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 10:59:38 -0000
--7uYPyRQQ5N0D02nI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:57:57PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:55:35PM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > > | 4135 Jul 1 08:08 sysklogd-1.4.1-alt14
> > > > | 911 Jul 1 08:12 tcb-0.9.8.5-alt1
> > > > | 2977 Jul 1 08:21 traceroute-1.4a12-alt5
> > > > | 11053 Jul 1 08:25 urlview-0.9-ipl7mdk
> > > >
> > > > Я пересобирал на SKIF'е.
> > > Интересно, _как_ должно было случиться это различие при пересборке в BTE?
> > > При условии использования одного и того же репозитария, конечно.
> >
> > Использовались разные средства пересборки + немного отличающиеся репозитарии.
> Так кому же верить в таком случае? Чей репозитарий был более
> авторитативен? :)
Мой завтра. :)
--
ldv
--7uYPyRQQ5N0D02nI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/AWmY9viEa8HiNCkRAignAJ9UTcRNewoi1WNTXwBz1+mk4tKtzgCbBccX
ocXk2RWoS8jG3p2I1rjvYB8=
=ZW6d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--7uYPyRQQ5N0D02nI--
>From rider@altlinux.com Tue Jul 1 15:06:27 2003
Return-Path: <rider@altlinux.com>
Delivered-To: devel@lrn.ru
Received: from master.altlinux.ru (master.altlinux.ru [62.118.250.235])
by lrn.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08AD48300
for <devel@lrn.ru>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:06:25 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from riderbook.office.altlinux.ru (unknown [195.112.97.88])
by master.altlinux.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0B1E31CF
for <devel@altlinux.ru>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:06:25 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from altlinux.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by riderbook.office.altlinux.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921E322AF0
for <devel@altlinux.ru>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:55:05 +0400 (MSD)
Message-ID: <3F016889.1080104@altlinux.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 14:55:05 +0400
From: Anton Farygin <rider@altlinux.com>
Organization: ALT Linux
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru-RU; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030627
X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, ru
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
Subject: Re: [devel] =?KOI8-R?Q?=F0=C1=CB=C5=D4=D9=2C_=CB=CF=D4=CF=D2=D9?=
=?KOI8-R?Q?=C5_=CE=C5_=D0=C5=D2=C5=D3=CF=C2=D2=C1=CC=C9=D3=D8_=28S?=
=?KOI8-R?Q?isyphus=2Ebase=29?=
References: <3F013410.3050703@altlinux.com>
<20030701103437.GA16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
<3F0163AD.2090608@altlinux.com> <20030701105134.GC5308@sam-solutions.net>
<20030701105535.GF16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
<20030701105757.GD5308@sam-solutions.net>
<20030701105936.GG16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030701105936.GG16325@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.1.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list <devel.altlinux.ru>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:06:28 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dmitry V. Levin пишет:
| On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:57:57PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
|
|>On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:55:35PM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
|>
|>>>>| 4135 Jul 1 08:08 sysklogd-1.4.1-alt14
|>>>>| 911 Jul 1 08:12 tcb-0.9.8.5-alt1
|>>>>| 2977 Jul 1 08:21 traceroute-1.4a12-alt5
|>>>>| 11053 Jul 1 08:25 urlview-0.9-ipl7mdk
|>>>>
|>>>>Я пересобирал на SKIF'е.
|>>>
|>>>Интересно, _как_ должно было случиться это различие при пересборке в
BTE?
|>>>При условии использования одного и того же репозитария, конечно.
|>>
|>>Использовались разные средства пересборки + немного отличающиеся
репозитарии.
|>
|>Так кому же верить в таком случае? Чей репозитарий был более
|>авторитативен? :)
|
|
| Мой завтра. :)
Или мой - вчера ;-)
Rgds,
Rider
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/AWiIqohfd2vlwKsRAktBAJ9vxzIY1Ym4UUI0GXlG6Rq8WCuhKwCfYepL
bfFBK5hz5NkLh3L5a/d5H6c=
=baey
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread