From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 14:00:42 +0400 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: ALT Devel discussion list Subject: Re: [devel] Re: buildreq Message-ID: <20030524100042.GA12553@basalt.office.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: <20030522114038.GG3117@inferno.immo> <20030522120815.GC4337@basalt.office.altlinux.org> <20030522122814.GH3117@inferno.immo> <20030522133238.GC6487@basalt.office.altlinux.org> <20030523224806.GA3088@hell.devel.altlinux.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-fingerprint: 9658 398D 181B 1200 8FC5 26B8 F6F8 846B C1E2 3429 Sender: devel-admin@altlinux.ru Errors-To: devel-admin@altlinux.ru X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: devel@altlinux.ru List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 12:57:38PM +0400, Ivan Zakharyaschev wrote: > > 2. > > Этот пункт вроде противоречит принятым идеям о > предпочтительном наименовании пакетов. Поправьте меня, если я > ошибаюсь. Да, противоречит. Я почти всегда использую lib%name-devel/lib%name-devel-static, и всем советую делать именно так. -- ldv --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQE+z0LK9viEa8HiNCkRAu6zAJdJelUUtjj00yjVq5MOMbvw9MO6AJ9VqfUs AumyraDs9RGAqlAIplmeiw== =yGqV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--