From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 17:32:38 +0400 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: ALT Devel discussion list Subject: Re: [devel] Re: buildreq Message-ID: <20030522133238.GC6487@basalt.office.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: <20030522114038.GG3117@inferno.immo> <20030522120815.GC4337@basalt.office.altlinux.org> <20030522122814.GH3117@inferno.immo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030522122814.GH3117@inferno.immo> X-fingerprint: 9658 398D 181B 1200 8FC5 26B8 F6F8 846B C1E2 3429 Sender: devel-admin@altlinux.ru Errors-To: devel-admin@altlinux.ru X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: devel@altlinux.ru List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:28:14PM +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote: > > > Почему именно так? Не лучше ли: > > Кажется, лучше. > > Никто не против? > Надо бы какой-нибудь Package Naming Policy под это дело > подвести... На docs.altlinux.ru пусто ;-) Я принимаю пожелания в виде патчей к Sisyphus/doc/alt-packaging/. -- ldv --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+zNF29viEa8HiNCkRAvfDAJ9lnqPXyyDwezihNK9zmZHh6jqHuwCeN2oW VTT5bN9Y+gFRDOGM6iCs/Pw= =gvss -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh--